pexels-pixabay-64705-1280x776.jpg

Availability of startup funding remains challenging, as venture investors demand both growth potential and a solid financial foundation. Beyond primary funding rounds (seed, Series A, etc.), some startups with more business traction have chosen to raise capital through IPOs (initial public offering) or to consider an M&A (merger/acquisition). While primary rounds provide initial growth capital, mature startups seek liquidity and returns. Besides capital, IPOs offer access to public investors and the option of a secondary raise. An M&A could create strategic partnerships, providing resources, technology, and market access for accelerated growth.

In a thriving IPO market, startups pursuing a public listing can stimulate M&A activity by setting valuations and offering companies flexibility. Many firms pursue both IPO and M&A to maximize investor returns. This competition between acquirers and public investors can drive higher valuations. IPOs also benchmark private company values, aiding M&A negotiations. Startups have more options: going public for capital and visibility or merging for synergies. An active IPO market fosters dynamic deal-making, benefiting both startups and investors.

IPOs and M&A are crucial components of the venture capital ecosystem. Successful exits through these channels enable venture capitalists (VCs) to monetize investments and return capital to limited partners (LPs). This liquidity empowers LPs to reinvest in new VC funds, funding innovative startups and perpetuating the venture capital cycle. A decline in IPO and M&A activity can disrupt this cycle, potentially slowing investments in new startups.

In Southeast Asia, primary funding remains stagnant and investment deals are taking a prolonged period of time to close. Bridge rounds have become a common stop-gap measure with investors working with startup management to trim operating expenses. However, these bridge rounds often provide less capital and shorter runways, making them less than ideal for long-term growth. Investors are generally reluctant to fund startups through bridge rounds repeatedly.

Photo credit: Tara Winstead

 

M&As as Catalyst for Inorganic Growth

Since 2006, Southeast Asia has witnessed a growing number of startup M&A transactions over the past years. According to TechinAsia, there have been more than 500 M&A transactions across Southeast Asia involving startups, with an average of 50 transactions over the last 5 years.

M&A in the startup sector continued at a steady pace in 2023, exceeding pre-pandemic levels. Carta highlighted a notable shift where a larger proportion of acquired startups were smaller companies with fewer than 10 employees. This marked the highest percentage of small-scale acquisitions in the past five years. In contrast, the number of larger deals involving companies with 100 or more employees reached a new low. This trend might indicate that smaller startups are increasingly viewing M&A as a viable exit strategy to secure their future.

Startup M&A is holding steady despite an IPO chill,Carta (1 March 2024)

Tech giants like Nvidia and Microsoft have built up substantial cash reserves and are actively on a roll-up play. Following the playbook of predecessors like Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google, these behemoths have grown their empires through hundreds of acquisitions over the years. Their strategy typically involves dominating their core business, such as e-commerce for Amazon or search for Google, and then expanding into new sectors through strategic acquisitions. This approach allows them to diversify revenue streams, out-manoeuvre competitors, and solidify their market position.

Recent M&A news includes Nvidia’s announced acquisition of Run:ai, a company specializing in GPU workload management. Nividia and Run:ai have been business partners since 2020 and the Nvidia acquisition could be a strategic move to solidify its position as a leader in the AI industry. In another high-profile deal, Google announced plans to buy Wiz, a prominent Israeli cybersecurity startup, for a record-breaking $23 billion. This is a very substantial acquisition and highlights Google’s commitment to its cloud and cybersecurity offerings. However, reports have indicated that Wiz chose to remain private and independent, opting to pursue an IPO instead.

In Southeast Asia and as far back in 2016, Google made its first strategic acquisition of a startup Pie, a Slack-like team communications service based in Singapore. Pie had a talented team of engineers, and Google likely saw the acquisition as an opportunity to jumpstart its first engineering team devoted to Southeast Asia. A couple of months back in July 2024, Singapore-based ride-hailing and delivery giant Grab Holdings acquired the popular restaurant reservation app Chope to add to its core services of ride-hailing and food delivery. This acquisition seems to align with Grab’s strategy to expand beyond its core services of ride-hailing and food delivery. By combining Chope’s restaurant reservations with Grab’s transportation and delivery services, Grab can offer a seamless user experience. This enables consumers to book a restaurant, take a ride to the venue, and enjoy a meal, all within the Grab app. Chope’s strong reputation in the region can help Grab extend its consumer services to the vast Southeast Asian market of over 650 million people.

Omnilytics, a Singapore-based fashion analytics provider, acquired Malaysian data labeling platform Supahands for $20 million. This strategic move aims to enhance Omnilytics’ Product Match solution, which helps brands and retailers compare product pricing across different platforms. Supahands’ expertise in data labeling will be instrumental in improving the accuracy and efficiency of Omnilytics’ product matching technology, providing clients with even more valuable insights into market trends and pricing strategies.

New York Stock Exchange-listed PropertyGuru (PGRU) expanded its services beyond property listings by acquiring Sendhelper, a home cleaning and maintenance provider. This acquisition allows users to find properties, get financing, and manage their homes all within one platform. In a surprise move, PropertyGuru agreed to a take-private deal with EQT Private Capital Asia, valuing the company at $1.1 billion. PropertyGuru agreed to a take-private deal with EQT Private Capital Asia, valuing the company at $1.1 billion. This merger brings together EQT’s expertise in technology and marketplaces with PropertyGuru’s online property platform, aiming to create a stronger and more comprehensive entity.

Photo credit: Markus Winkler

 

From Competitive Foes to Collaborative Partners via M&A

As the Southeast Asia venture and startup landscape matures, M&A can be seen as an inorganic growth to enter new markets, bolster customer base and product offerings while eliminating competitive frictions. These strategic mergers and acquisitions can help companies accelerate their growth, gain access to new technologies, and strengthen their market position.

UK-based data and analytics firm Ascential’s purchase of Singaporean e-commerce omnichannel solutions provider Intrepid for up to $250 million in upfront cash and deferred considerations is a prime example. Similarly, New York’s Fintech Payoneer’s acquisition of Singaporean global HR and payroll startup Skuad for $61 million underscores this trend. Both companies share a focus on serving small-to-medium-sized employers with distributed teams, offering international payroll and remote onboarding solutions.

The merger of Singaporean dating startups Lunch Actually and Paktor Group demonstrates the potential benefits of combining forces to expand market reach and deliver enhanced customer experiences. By leveraging their complementary online and offline services, the merged entity can offer more personalised one-on-one dating introductions.

A Straits Times report revealed that a significant portion of Southeast Asia’s used car trade remains offline, indicating substantial growth potential for online platforms. With an annual market value exceeding S$290 billion, this burgeoning industry has attracted the attention of unicorn companies seeking to capitalise on its opportunities. To solidify their market positions and expand their offerings, Southeast Asia’s automotive e-commerce leaders, Carro and Carsome, have embarked on an aggressive acquisition and investment strategy, focusing on platforms that provide complementary services within the used car ecosystem.

Carro has made several acquisitions or investments such as Beyond Cars (Hong Kong), MyTukar (Malaysia), MPMRent and Jualo (Indonesia) giving it access to 8 markets, including Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Hong Kong, Japan, and Taiwan. CarSome also made several strategic moves to acquire or invest into CarTimes Automobile (Singapore), WapCar and AutoFun, iCar Asia (Malaysia) and PT Universal Collection (Indonesia) giving the company access to new markets and interestingly into the generation of digital user content for the automotive industry.

While these examples highlight the potential advantages of mergers and acquisitions, it’s important to note that not all such endeavours result in success. Nasdaq-listed MoneyHero’s unsuccessful attempt to acquire MoneySmart underscores the challenges associated with such transactions. Both MoneyHero and MoneySmart are leading companies in the personal finance sector but appear to be on diverging paths in terms of strategy, financial sustainability, and outlook.

 

The Dilemma: To IPO or not to IPO

An IPO can be a strategic move for a tech company, offering several advantages. It provides access to a broader pool of investors, enabling companies to raise significant capital. This capital can be used to refinance existing debt, invest in growth initiatives, or reward employees and investors with liquidity options.

For matured tech companies like Plaid, Stripe, and Klarna who have filed and are lining up to go public, current market conditions do not seem to be optimal for listing. SPACs (Special Purpose Acquisition Companies) have been a popular route for tech startups to go public in recent years. However, the SPAC performance has been mixed, with few companies experiencing significant success while others have faced challenges. The SPAC route is technically not viable anymore.

There are many reasons why an IPO could be delayed and one of the key reasons could be the focus on topline growth and bottomline profitability. Singapore’s leading Fintech Nium has pushed back its plans for a US IPO till the end of 2026 in a bid to focus on growth and market expansion. Used car marketplace Carro is also positioning for growth and profitability while lining itself up for a public listing. According to a Citi report, the volume of IPOs this year is a fraction of the more than US$240 billion seen during the same period in 2021, before the Fed’s rate hikes. It’s also below the average seen in the decade before the pandemic.

Focusing on startups who have braved the public listing route, Southeast Asia startups such as MoneyHero (NASDAQ:MNY), Ohmyhome (NASDAQ:OMH), Ryde (NYSEAMERICAN: RYDE), Nuren Group (NSX:NRN), Bukalapak.com (IDX: BUKA) and many more have seen their share price dipped by as much as 80% since listing. A public listed company is subject to scrutiny and expectations from investors and the stock exchange. If the share prices continue their descent and stay below the exchange’s minimum price threshold for an extended period, these companies could face a potential delisting penalty.

Photo credit: Arturo A

 

The Funding Outlook for 2025

The venture capital landscape in 2025 stands at a crossroads of opportunity and caution. The US Federal Reserve’s strategic interest rate reduction, the first cut since 2020, has catalyzed renewed optimism, with investors keenly anticipating further cuts. While many venture capitalists see this as a potential renaissance for a previously tepid market, the implications extend beyond mere capital availability. 

In an era of abundant capital, true differentiation lies not in securing funding, but in deploying it with strategic precision. While easier access to capital may tempt startups to accelerate growth aggressively, maintaining steadfast financial discipline remains paramount. By prioritizing sustainable expansion and implementing sound financial management practices, companies build a resilient foundation capable of weathering diverse economic conditions.

Beyond traditional venture equity, savvy startups are increasingly diversifying their funding strategies to reduce reliance on single capital sources. This comprehensive approach encompasses various financial instruments, from venture debt to working capital lines of credit, enabling both organic growth and strategic mergers and acquisitions. As the startup ecosystem evolves, companies are particularly leveraging debt financing to fuel M&A activities, forging partnerships with entities that share aligned goals and missions to drive meaningful expansion.


US-based-Capria-makes-first-investment-in-S-E-Asia-through-Genesis-Alternative-Ventures-Fund-1-Image-640x400-1.jpg


The Business Times

GENESIS Alternative Ventures has raised US$125 million in a final close for its second venture-debt fund focused on South-east Asia. The majority of investors are returning investors from the venture lender’s first fund, including Sassoon Investment Corporation, Korea Development Bank, Silverhorn and Japan’s Aozora Bank and Mizuho Leasing. New investors in the second fund include Mizuho Bank and US-based investing platform OurCrowd.

For full Business Times article (10 September 2024)



Bloomberg

Genesis Alternative Ventures, a private lender to ventures and growth-stage companies, closed its second debt fund at the lower end of its target as global investors remain cautious about Southeast Asia’s startup industry. The Singapore-based firm raised $125 million for the fund to finance young companies across Southeast Asia, securing new investors including Japan’s Mizuho Bank and Israel’s OurCrowd Ltd.

For full Bloomberg article (10 September 2024)



Market Watch

Singapore-based Genesis Alternative Ventures has raised $125 million in its latest fundraising round, attracting investments from global investors including Japan’s Mizuho Bank. The second Southeast Asia-focused venture debt fund has already deployed more than $20 million in loans to a handful of startups across the region, including in Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, according to Genesis co-founder and managing partner Jeremy Loh.

For full Market Watch article (10 September 2024)



The Straits Times

Genesis Alternative Ventures, a private lender to ventures and growth-stage companies, closed its second debt fund at the lower end of its target as global investors remain cautious about South-east Asia’s start-up industry. The Singapore-based firm raised US$125 million (S$163 million) for the fund to finance young companies across South-east Asia, securing new investors including Japan’s Mizuho Bank and Israel’s OurCrowd. The fund had sought US$120 million to US$180 million, and took more than two years to reach the close.

For full Technode Global article (10 September 2024)



TechInAsia

Genesis Alternative Ventures has raised US$125 million in the final close for its second venture-debt fund focused on Southeast Asia. The majority of investors are returning backers from the venture lender’s first fund. They include Sassoon Investment Corporation, Korea Development Bank, Silverhorn, Aozora Bank, and Mizuho Leasing. Japanese banking firm Mizuho Bank and US-based investing platform OurCrowd jump in as new investors.

For full TechInAsia article (30 Aug 2022)



The Singapore Business Review

Genesis Alternative Ventures raises $163m for SEA venture debt fund It has already deployed US$20m venture loans to start-ups across the region. Genesis Alternative Ventures raised a total of $163m (US$125m) for its second Southeast Asia-focused venture debt fund. According to Genesis, the fund saw 80% of its investors from the first round joining again, including Aozora Bank, Korea Development Bank, Mizuho Leasing, Sassoon Investment Corporation, and Silverhorn.

For full Singapore Business Review article (13 September 2024)



联合早报 (Lianhe Zaobao)

新加坡风险投资机构Genesis Alternative Ventures在最新一轮集资活动中,筹得1亿2500万美元(约1亿6328万新元)。Genesis Alternative Ventures(简称GAV)在星期二(9月10日)发表文告说,这轮集资活动是为第二个聚焦东南亚的创投债务基金(venture debt fund)筹资。其中80%的投资者也曾投资于第一个类似的基金。

For full Lianhe Zaobao article (10 September 2024)



Wealth Briefing Asia

Genesis Alternative Ventures, the Southeast Asian firm headquartered in Singapore, announced yesterday that it has raised total commitments of $125 million for its second Southeast Asia-focused venture debt fund. The firm’s Fund II entity saw the return of more than 80 per cent of investors from Fund I, including Aozora Bank, Korea Development Bank, Mizuho Leasing, and Sassoon Investment Corporation and Silverhorn. New and notable investors in Fund II include Japanese mega bank, Mizuho Bank, and OurCrowd, the online global investing platform.

For full Wealth Briefing Asia article (12 September 2024)



Fintech News Singapore

Genesis Alternative Ventures has raised US$125 million for its second venture debt fund, aimed at supporting Southeast Asian startups. The fund attracted strong interest from existing and new investors, including Japan’s Mizuho Bank and global investment platform OurCrowd. Returning investors from the first fund include Aozora Bank, Korea Development Bank, Mizuho Leasing, Sassoon Investment Corporation, and Silverhorn. Genesis’ collaboration with Indonesia’s Superbank, announced in August 2023, will provide up to US$40 million in venture debt to tech startups in Indonesia.

For full Fintech News SG article (11 September 2024)



VC Wire

Genesis Alternative Ventures, a Singapore-based private lender to venture, and growth stage companies funded by tier-one VCs, raised US$125m for its second Southeast Asia-focused venture debt fund. Fund II received commitments from over 80% of investors from Fund I, including Aozora Bank, Korea Development Bank, Mizuho Leasing, Sassoon Investment Corporation and Silverhorn. New investors in Fund II included Mizuho Bank, and OurCrowd, the online global investing platform.

For full VC Wire article (10 September 2024)



Daily Social

Genesis Alternative Ventures, an investment firm for startups in Southeast Asia, has successfully raised a commitment of $125 million or equivalent to Rp1,9 trillion for venture debt fund (venture debt fund) both of them. This fund will focus on investing in technology startups in the Southeast Asia region.About 80% of investors from the first fund returned to participate in the new fund, including Aozora Bank, Korea Development Bank, Mizuho Leasing, Sassoon Investment Corporation, and Silverhorn. New investors joining this time include Mizuho Bank, a major Japanese bank, and OurCrowd, another global investment platform.

For full Daily Social article (10 September 2024)



Startups in Southeast Asia Krasia
KR Asia

Genesis Alternative Ventures, Singapore’s private venture debt firm, has secured USD 125 million in commitments for its second fund, tapping into a mix of loyal backers and fresh faces. Over 80% of investors from the firm’s first fund—including Aozora Bank, Korea Development Bank, Mizuho Leasing, and Silverhorn—renewed their support, while notable newcomers like Mizuho Bank and global platform OurCrowd joined the fold.

For full KR Asia article (10 September 2024)



Barrons

Singapore-based Genesis Alternative Ventures has raised $125 million in its latest fundraising round, attracting investments from global investors including Japan’s Mizuho Bank. The second Southeast Asia-focused venture debt fund has already deployed more than $20 million in loans to a handful of startups across the region, including in Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, according to Genesis co-founder and managing partner Jeremy Loh.

For full Barrons article (10 September 2024)



Tech Node Global

Singapore-based venture capital firm Genesis Alternative Ventures has raised total commitments of $125 million for its second Southeast Asia-focused venture debt fund. Fund II welcomes back over 80 percent of investors from Fund I, including Aozora Bank, Korea Development Bank, Mizuho Leasing, Sassoon Investment Corporation and Silverhorn, Genesis said in a statement on Tuesday. According to the statement, new and notable investors in Fund II include Japanese mega bank, Mizuho Bank, and OurCrowd, the online global investing platform.

For full Tech Node Global article (10 September 2024)



The Edge Malaysia

Genesis Alternative Ventures, a private lender to ventures and growth-stage companies, closed its second debt fund at the lower end of its target, as global investors remain cautious about Southeast Asia’s start-up industry. The Singapore-based firm raised US$125 million (RM544.69 million) for the fund to finance young companies across Southeast Asia, securing new investors, including Japan’s Mizuho Bank and Israel’s OurCrowd Ltd. The fund had sought US$120 million to US$180 million, and took more than two years to reach the close.

For full The Edge Malaysia article (10 September 2024)



The Edge Singapore

Genesis Alternative Ventures, a private lender to ventures and growth-stage companies, closed its second debt fund at the lower end of its target as global investors remain cautious about Southeast Asia’s start-up industry. The Singapore-based firm raised US$125 million ($163.14 million) for the fund to finance young companies across Southeast Asia, securing new investors including Japan’s Mizuho Bank and Israel’s OurCrowd. The fund had sought US$120 million to US$180 million, and took more than two years to reach the close.

For full The Edge Singapore article (10 September 2024)



The Asset

Singapore-based Genesis Alternative Ventures has raised US$125 million for its second Southeast Asia-focused venture debt fund, known as Fund II. This new fund is aimed at supporting start-ups across the region, particularly in sectors poised for growth. Over 80% of the investors from the company’s first fund have returned for Fund II, including prominent institutions Aozora Bank, Korea Development Bank, and Sassoon Investment Corporation. New investors include major Japanese financial institution Mizuho Bank and OurCrowd, an online global investing platform.

For full The Asset article (10 September 2024)



Yahoo

Genesis Alternative Ventures, a private lender to ventures and growth-stage companies, closed its second debt fund at the lower end of its target as global investors remain cautious about Southeast Asia’s startup industry. The Singapore-based firm raised $125 million for the fund to finance young companies across Southeast Asia, securing new investors including Japan’s Mizuho Bank and Israel’s OurCrowd Ltd. The fund had sought $120 million to $180 million, and took more than two years to reach the close.

For full Yahoo article (10 September 2024)



Solondais

Genesis Alternative Ventures, a Singapore-based private venture debt firm, has secured $125 million in commitments for its second fund, drawing on a mix of loyal backers and new faces. More than 80% of the firm’s first fund investors—including Aozora Bank, Korea Development Bank, Mizuho Leasing, and Silverhorn—renewed their support, while notable newcomers like Mizuho Bank and global platform OurCrowd joined the ranks.

For full Solondais article (10 September 2024)



Mami News

[마미뉴스] 이서영 기자=Genesis Alternative Ventures가 최근 수십억 원 규모의 두 번째 채무 펀드를 조성했다. 이는 동남아시아 스타트업 업계에 대한 글로벌 투자자들의 신중한 태도가 계속되는 가운데 이루어진 성과다. 해당 펀드는 1억 2천 5백만 달러를 모금하면서 마무리됐다. 이는 계획했던 1억 2천만 달러에서 1억 8천만 달러 사이의 목표 금액 범위의 하한선에 해당한다. 싱가포르에 본사를 둔 이 펀드는 일본의 미즈호 은행과 이스라엘의 아워크라우드 등을 새 투자자로 확보했다. 펀드 모집은 2년 이상의 시간을 요구했다.

For full Solondais article (10 September 2024)



DealStreet Asia

Singapore-based Genesis Alternative Ventures announced on Tuesday that it has closed its second Southeast Asia-focused venture debt fund securing commitments of $125 million. Dr Jeremy Loh, Genesis’ co-founder and managing partner, said they have already started deploying venture loans worth over $20 million from Fund II to startups across Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines.

For full DealStreet Asia article (10 September 2024)



02-Genesis-Group-Alt-Final-1280x853.jpg

MEDIA RELEASE

Genesis Alternative Ventures raises US$125 million for second venture debt fund

 

 

  • Fund II welcomes new investor, Mizuho Bank, as Limited Partner
  • Former EDB Chairman Philip Yeo joins Advisory Board

Singapore, 10 Sep 2024 – Genesis Alternative Ventures has raised total commitments of US$125 million for its second Southeast Asia-focused venture debt fund.

Fund II welcomes back over 80% of investors from Fund I, including Aozora Bank, Korea Development Bank, Mizuho Leasing, Sassoon Investment Corporation and Silverhorn. New and notable investors in Fund II include Japanese mega bank, Mizuho Bank, and OurCrowd, the online global investing platform. 

Separately, Genesis and Indonesia’s digital-focused bank, Superbank, announced a collaboration in August 2023 to provide up to US$40 million of venture debt to promising technology start-ups in Indonesia. Superbank counts Emtek, Grab, Singtel and KakaoBank as significant shareholders. 

Genesis also announced that Mr Philip Yeo, former Chairman of Singapore’s Economic Development Board, has joined Genesis’ Advisory Board. Mr Yeo is a veteran in the technology investment space across Southeast Asia and brings a wealth of experience and insights to guide Genesis’ continued growth and future strategies. 

Dr Jeremy Loh, Genesis’ Co-Founder and Managing Partner, said: “We are grateful for the continued support of our limited partners and pleased to welcome new strategic institutional investor, Mizuho Bank, to Fund II. We are also delighted to welcome Mr Philip Yeo to our Advisory Board, a true statesman and visionary in the technology and investment space.

“Fund II has already deployed venture loans of more than US$20 million to a handful of promising start-ups across the region, including in Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines. The current market has brought about a shift in start-up profiles, with a focus on leaner structures and a profitable mindset. Our portfolio companies exemplify this new direction, positioning themselves for long-term sustainability and success.”

Dr Loh added that while the start-up landscape presents its share of funding and exit challenges, Fund II has already marked its first successful warrant exit. “This validates the market demand for venture-backed companies that are strategically aligned with evolving market needs,” he said. 

Yasuhiro Kubota, Managing Executive Officer and co-CEO for APAC, Mizuho Bank, Ltd., said: “We are delighted to come on board with Genesis on a shared vision in the venture debt space. Southeast Asia continues to be an exciting region with a thriving start-up ecosystem. We are confident that this partnership will accelerate the growth of promising firms with access to capital, industry networks and expertise led by Genesis.”

Genesis extends debt to revenue-generating companies that are backed by venture capital funds. These start-ups typically do not qualify for regular bank loans because they lack collateral, or have not yet reached profitability, and/or their founders and institutional investors are keen to take venture debt to build up the company’s credit worthiness while equally seeking to minimise unnecessary equity dilution. 

 

About Genesis Alternative Ventures

Genesis Alternative Ventures is Southeast Asia’s leading private lender to venture and growth stage companies funded by tier-one VCs. Genesis is founded by a team of venture lending pioneers who have backed some of Southeast Asia’s best loved companies. Armed with a strong reputation among entrepreneurs and investors, Genesis is a trusted partner in empowering corporate growth while minimising shareholders’ equity dilution. Genesis was founded by Ben J Benjamin, Dr Jeremy Loh and Martin Tang in 2019.

 

For media queries, please contact: 

Catherine Ong Associates 

Catherine Ong

Mobile: (65) 9697 0007

Email: cath@catherineong.com

 

Romesh Navaratnarajah

Mobile: (65) 9016 0920

Email: romesh@catherineong.com

 

 


Eezee-Genesis-Logo-1280x719.jpeg

Jakarta, Indonesia, 29 August 2024 – Eezee is excited to announce a groundbreaking partnership with Genesis Alternative Ventures (“Genesis”). This collaboration marks a significant milestone in trade working capital financing in Indonesia, aiming to bridge the gap between multinational corporations (MNCs) and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), facilitating smoother and more efficient transactions.

 

Addressing a Critical Challenge

Many large MNCs in Indonesia face significant challenges in unlocking demand from SME suppliers. These SMEs often struggle with cash flow issues, which hinder their ability to meet procurement demands and offer necessary credit terms. Consequently, both SMEs and MNCs miss out on valuable business opportunities, stunting potential growth and economic progress.

 

An Optimal Debt Financing Solution

Through this strategic partnership, Eezee, alongside Genesis, can help bridge the working capital gap. MNCs can now conduct transactions via Eezee, backed by a committed debt facility from our venture debt partners. This financing model alleviates cash flow constraints for SMEs, eliminating the need for them to source external funds to meet procurement demands. By financing these transactions, we ensure that SMEs have the liquidity to seamlessly serve the procurement needs of large corporations

 

Empowering Indonesia’s SMEs

This debt facility is expected to make a substantial impact on the Indonesian market, empowering the country’s 62 million SMEs to focus on growth and innovation, tapping into previously unreachable demand from MNCs. This partnership aims to create a thriving business ecosystem where both SMEs and MNCs can collaborate to conduct business.

 

About Eezee

Eezee provides Global 2000 enterprises with procurement management solutions to manage their tail spend through our MRO industrial supplies marketplace and payment platform. Our platform, designed to work with third-party procurement and enterprise resource management software, enables businesses to pay vendors in “minutes” rather than weeks by cutting down on the administrative and operational challenges that come with engaging and paying vendors.

For further information on Eezee, please visit www.eezee.co

 

About Genesis Alternative Ventures

Genesis Alternative Ventures is Southeast Asia’s leading private lender to venture and growth-stage companies funded by tier-one VCs. Genesis is founded by a team of venture lending pioneers who have backed some of Southeast Asia’s best loved companies. Armed with a strong reputation among entrepreneurs and investors, Genesis is a trusted partner in empowering corporate growth while minimising shareholders’ equity dilution. Genesis was founded by Ben J Benjamin, Dr Jeremy Loh and Martin Tang in 2019.

For further information on Genesis Alternative Ventures, please visit www.genesisventures.co


nathan-dumlao-r-KfktlyBL0-unsplash-1-1280x853.jpg

Coffee is big business. With a market size estimated at $461.25 billion in 2022 and projected to expand at a CAGR of 5.2% from 2023 to 2030, it’s clear that coffee consumption is on the rise. The coffee market in Southeast Asia is projected to grow by 3.92% annually from 2024 to 2029, resulting in a market volume of

$10.3 billion in 2029. This growth reflects the region’s vibrant coffee scene, with consumers seeking unique experiences and emphasising sustainability and ethical sourcing.

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) brands are companies that generally bypass traditional retail channels to sell and market their products directly to consumers, typically through online platforms. The big idea is that this approach allows brands to have greater control over their marketing, customer experience, and pricing. The rise of e-commerce and digital marketing has fueled the growth of DTC brands, making it easier for startups and established companies alike to reach target audiences directly.

More and more, DTC brands have pursued an omnichannel approach in order to lay the foundations of sustainable business models. Many of the first movers in this space (think Warby Parker, Casper, Glossier etc) have already successfully integrated both off and online models.

Nowhere more clearly do we observe this trend than in the coffee space. Grab and go (GAG) coffee chains embrace a digital-first strategy to differentiate itself from traditional F&B businesses. The “New Retail” concept was put forward by Alibaba’s Jack Ma in 2016, which enables a seamless engagement between the online and offline world through data technology. A typical GAG coffee outlet has just enough space for the baristas to operate. There are limited seats (if any) and bare interiors. Smaller stores translate to lower rent and fewer employees. This significantly reduces each store’s operational costs, allowing chains to offer lower prices while maintaining a healthy margin. This leaner model also allows chains to expand more quickly. Customers can place their orders through the mobile app for pick up at their preferred outlet or delivery to their doorstep.

Coffee In Asia & Southeast Asia

Asia has already witnessed the emergence of a key pan-Asian home-grown coffee player – Jollibee Foods (JFC.PS) the region’s largest fast-food chain. Jollibee diversified into the coffee business through a series of acquisitions. Notably, in July 2024, Jollibee acquired a 70% stake in privately held South Korea’s Compose Coffee for $238 million. This followed their earlier acquisition of The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf (CBTL) in 2019 for $350 million and a controlling stake in Vietnamese coffee chain Highlands Coffee in 2017.

Over the past five to seven years, the coffee landscape in Southeast Asia has undergone a remarkable transformation often with a strong flavour of technology (no double entendre intended) – download an app, get a first order at under $1 and receive your caffeine drink in 2 mins. Traditional coffee shops, boutique cafes and tech-savvy chains have sprouted up across the region, creating a vibrant and competitive market. From global giants like Starbucks and CBTL to homegrown unicorns like China’s Luckin and Indonesia’s Kopi Kenangan, coffee brands are vying for their share of the Southeast Asia market and consumer taste buds.

Figure 1: Top 10 Coffee Producing Countries in the World (Source: Biz Latin Hub)

Asia’s coffee consumption has grown by 1.5% in the past five years, compared to 0.5% growth in Europe and 1.2% in the U.S, according to the International Coffee Organization, turning the region into the coffee world’s soon-to-be center of gravity. Traditionally a tea-drinking region, Asia’s growing coffee consumption is largely driven by the rise of a middle class that is keen to try anything trendy.

Deeply rooted in their colonial past, coffee cultures and export prowess define Southeast Asian coffee scenes. Vietnam’s French influence and Indonesia’s Dutch heritage are evident in their brewing traditions. Both countries remain in the top five global coffee producers (Figure 1).

Mobile Platforms Shake Up The Market And Challenge Established Coffee Brands

Fueled by a burgeoning middle class with rising disposable income and a growing appreciation for specialty coffee, Southeast Asia is experiencing a coffee revolution of its own. This trend has given rise to a wave of innovative coffee startups that are disrupting the traditional market landscape.

Price and unique flavour profiles are key drivers for many Southeast Asian entrepreneurs venturing into the coffee industry. Consider Starbucks’ pricing: a tall latte costs an American just 2% of their daily median income, but in Indonesia, that same drink can consume a staggering 30% of a local’s daily income (Figure 2). This vast disparity highlights the opportunity for homegrown coffee startups to cater to local tastes and offer competitive pricing model.

Figure 2: The Price of a Starbucks Tall Latte in Every Country (Source: Visual Capitalist)

While GAG chains thrive on digital efficiency and affordability, established brands like Starbucks are looking to bridge the gap with their own digital initiatives, recognizing the changing consumer landscape. Starbucks wants to be a welcoming space between home and work and hence, customer experience within the physical store is paramount. However, they also recognise the growing importance of digital integration.

In China, for example, Starbucks partnered with Alibaba to bridge the gap with competitors like Luckin Coffee. Through this collaboration, they leveraged Hema, Alibaba’s supermarket chain, to expand their delivery radius through “Star Kitchens” located within Hema stores. Following this success, Starbucks expanded its pre-order and in-store pickup options beyond its own app, integrating it with four Alibaba platforms like Alipay. This year, they further embraced the digital landscape by signing a regional partnership with Grab to enhance their reach within Southeast Asia

Kopi Kenangan, also known as Kenangan Coffee, has over 800 outlets and monthly sales of millions of cups. Their success hinges on a meticulously-crafted pricing strategy. Take the “Kopi Kenangan Mantan,” their signature iced latte with palm sugar, for example. At only Rp24,000 ($1.50), it is a steal compared to international chains. By offering locally crafted drinks significantly cheaper than Starbucks, they have tapped into a lucrative market gap without sacrificing profitability. This winning formula lies in an innovative retail concept: a seamless blend of small, convenient offline stores with robust online ordering services. This technology-first approach allows them to reduce operating costs and maximize profits for continued affordability. They are not alone in this game – companies like Jago Coffee and Sejuta Jiwa are all brewing up delicious and affordable options for the growing Indonesian market.

Photo credits: Revi Coffee Vietnam and Kopi Kenangan Indonesia

A Shot At Brewing Up Billions

VCs are bullish on the Southeast Asian coffee scene pouring significant funds into this burgeoning sector. The region’s consumer-focused startups grabbed the largest share of venture capital deal value last year, replacing software as the hottest investment destination. According to PitchBook’s 2024 Southeast Asia Private Capital Breakdown, $4.2 billion was invested in Southeast Asian B2C startups in 2023, a 31.3% increase from the previous year. It’s worth noting that this growth stands out – coffee was one of the few sectors to see a rise in deal value in 2023, and it represented a significant 36.5% of the total deal value for the region, its highest percentage since 2020.

This surge in VC interest translates directly to developments in the Southeast Asian coffee landscape. Coffee-related startups are a major driver of the D2C boom, offering innovative and convenient coffee experiences for a growing and discerning consumer base. Let’s explore some specific examples across the region:

    • Established Players with Big Brews: Indonesia boasts established coffee giants like Kopi Kenangan which has secured over $240 million in funding and achieved coveted unicorn status. Fore Coffee, another Indonesian player, is also a major player, having raised more than $40 million to date and offering a specialty coffee experience.
    • Emerging Players Brewing Innovation: New startups are brewing up excitement with innovative concepts. Malaysia’s Koppiku has secured $2.5 million, while Vietnamese tech-enabled coffee chain Révi Coffee & Tea, highlighting the growing appeal of Vietnamese coffee brands. founded by former Gojek executives, is making waves. Additionally, ZUS Coffee in Malaysia is reportedly preparing for a significant $53.5 million investment round. The Philippines with Grab-and-go Pickup Coffee raised $40 million and seeking to expand internationally into Mexico’s value-focused coffee market with an outlet in the Polanco neighbourhood of Mexico City.
    • Sustainable Solutions Sipping Success: VCs aren’t just focused on established models. Singapore’s Prefer, a startup offering bean-free coffee capsules for a more sustainable future, has secured $2 million in seed funding. This investment shows that VCs are looking beyond traditional models and towards innovative solutions that cater to the growing sustainability consciousness of consumers.

The surge in VC investment in Southeast Asian coffee startups translates to a plethora of choices for consumers. From established giants offering familiar comfort to innovative newcomers shaking things up, and sustainability-focused solutions for the eco-conscious, there’s something brewing for everyone. This fierce competition can be seen as a positive force, driving down prices and pushing boundaries in terms of service and product offerings. While some brands like Flash Coffee may not survive the intense competition, the survivors will be those that best adapt to consumer preferences and market dynamics.


austin-distel-RX_0vwSPiWs-unsplash-1280x853.jpg

The equity winter is well underway and has impacted tech ecosystems globally. The catalysts behind this funding drought – rising interest rates, economic uncertainty, and a recalibration of valuations – are well-documented. While hopes for an imminent thaw remain, investors and start-ups have adapted to the new reality of longer and more difficult fundraising rounds with many companies choosing instead to cut costs, preserve cash, and raise bridge rounds from insiders until the equity market returns.

How has venture debt fared during this time? Have lenders been able to plug the gap or have they experienced similar trends? How did the collapse of venture lender behemoth Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in March 2023 impact the lending ecosystem? Will venture lending developments in the United States (the undisputed market leader for venture lenders and borrowers) signal what’s round the corner for the Southeast Asia ecosystem?

We consider these questions and in parallel highlight key observations from Dr Jeremy Loh’s attendance at the second annual Venture Debt Conference held in March 2024 in New York (where Genesis participated in discussions and networking opportunities with the likes of prominent banks with venture lending businesses such as Silicon Valley Bank, a division of First Citizens Bank, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, Comerica and a spectrum of private debt funds ranging from dedicated venture debt funds like Runway Growth, Vistara Growth, Bootstrap Europe to private credit players such as Horizon Tech Finance.

Surprising Early Resilience Despite Headwinds

Figure 1: Data aggregated from PitchBook and Deloitte Tech and Media Predictions

 

Market predictions following the SVB saga anticipated a significant decline in US venture debt financing for 2023. Forecasts suggested a potential drop exceeding 50%, ending a four-year streak of annual activity above $30 billion.

However, conference participants were bullish about venture debt pipeline opportunities. In fact, PitchBook data revealed a surprising resilience, with 2023 marking the fifth consecutive year surpassing the $30 billion threshold (Figure 1). Despite this positive development, a slowdown in capital availability within the venture sector is expected to impact 2024 figures. Estimates suggest a potential decline to a range of $14-16 billion but the outlier driving strong venture debt demand could push figures up to 2018 level of $27 billion.

A deeper analysis of venture debt deal count by startup stage sheds light on the allocation of venture debt capital (Figure 2, next page). PitchBook data indicates that seed and early-stage companies have experienced the most significant decline in deal volume. This aligns with the fact that SVB, which previously held a 50% market share in early-stage bank venture debt, has seen its lending shrink to roughly 20%. Conversely, late-stage loan activity has seen resilience and exhibited minimal decline, with 2023 emerging as the second-most active year in terms of deal count. Interestingly, PitchBook believes that there will be a continuation of the overall trend, predicting that venture debt in the US will exceed $30 billion for a fifth consecutive year in 2024. This optimistic outlook stands in contrast to the prevailing market sentiment, and only time will tell if it materialises when the first-quarter data of 2025 becomes available.

Figure 2: Venture debt loan count by stage

 

New Normal For Venture Debt: Proven Performers Welcome, VC Backing No Guarantee

The current economic climate has left many startups’ balance sheets in a less than ideal state compared to just a couple years ago. This tough environment has prompted investors and lenders to offer founders advice that may differ from what they’re accustomed to hearing. The message from Conference participants was clear: take the capital you can get – even if it’s at a down round with a liquidation preference – if that’s the only way to keep fighting.

Major venture and growth debt lenders are signalling a notable shift in their priorities. They are now open to financing established businesses with proven revenue models, even if they haven’t secured a recent equity round. In contrast, companies with dated equity rounds, limited traction, and a failure to reduce cash burn are the least preferred borrowers.

The focus for lenders has shifted to evaluating a company’s fundamentals – strong products, revenue generation, and a clear plan to bridge their funding gap. Profitability is seen as a major plus. Interestingly, the prestigious pedigree of a startup’s venture backers (e.g. Sequoia, Khosla Ventures) now carries less weight. As one lender put it, the key question used to be “Who’s backing you?”, but now a solid business case and financial runway are paramount in addition.

This evolving funding landscape requires startups to adapt their approach and messaging to appeal to the new priorities of investors and lenders. Those that can demonstrate financial discipline, revenue traction, and a clear path to profitability will be best positioned to secure the capital they need to weather the current economic storm.

Partnering With The Right Lender

When it comes to securing venture debt financing, the choice of lending partner is a crucial decision for startups. Considering that 76% of venture debt loans require amendments throughout their lifetime, startups must focus on finding a lender who can truly work alongside them as a strategic partner for the best possible outcome.

Lenders that take a “full platform approach”, tracking not only the financial performance of its portfolio, but also the holistic relationship and overall support provided to each company and founder are ideal partners. This level of commitment and consultative approach is key for startups navigating the complexities of the venture ecosystem.

Lenders with deep relationships within the venture capital community are also an important factor when choosing a reliable debt provider. These lenders are often involved in the debt raise conversation, providing valuable insights and alignment with the startup’s investors. Startups must be fully aware of the debt terms, such as meeting cash runway covenants, and understand the reporting requirements and third-party items demanded by the lender. The management team (and their key equity stakeholders) must be well-versed in navigating the positive and negative covenants.

Building trust and confidence in the counterparty relationship is paramount. Startups should seek lenders with a proven track record of working through challenging cycles and decisions alongside stable management teams. Forging these relationships proactively, and picking the lender’s brain on debt structure, can give startups an advantage. Creativity and sophistication in negotiations can also help bridge gaps, as the terms of warrants and other financing events can vary. Thorough due diligence is key, as startups can expect longer and more involved processes when selecting a venture debt partner.

Here’s a summary of the key points discussed by Conference participants:

  • Venture debt is more art than science – it’s crucial to find a lender that truly understands your business and the innovation economy;
  • Look for lenders with the right “Four Cs”: Capital, Commitment, Consultative approach, and Consistency through economic cycles;
  • Venture debt should be used judiciously, not as the sole source of runway – it needs to be part of a balanced financing strategy;
  • Startups must perform extensive due diligence on potential lenders, not just the other way around;
  • Venture debt can provide benefits like non-dilutive capital, runway extension, and acquisition/CAPEX funding – but the right lender partnership is key.

 Navigating Venture Debt In A Challenging Funding Climate

As startups navigate the current funding landscape, the consideration of venture debt has become increasingly important. However, startups must approach this financing option with strategic foresight, balancing the benefits with the potential risks. In the current climate, the priority should be on securing access to capital and maintaining flexibility, rather than getting too caught up in the mathematical details.

One key factor to consider is the interest rate environment. While most lenders anticipate that interest rates will start to fall towards the mid-to-late 2024 timeframe, this could affect the repayment burden if rates are kept flat or for unforeseen circumstances begin to rise. This shifting rate landscape should factor into a startup’s decision-making process when evaluating venture debt.

Overleveraging debt can lead to negative outcomes, so startups must take the appropriate amount of leverage and have a clear repayment plan. Lenders view a “Hail Mary” situation as a red flag, so startups should aim to have a clear path to new equity or an M&A term sheet to make the venture debt more viable.

Companies seeking large debt raises may be a concerning signal, as it could suggest limited equity availability. Combining equity and debt can provide working capital and growth capital, but the management team must carefully consider and align with their board on the best approach.

Building strong borrower-lender relationships is crucial, looking beyond just interest rates. Startups should prioritize choosing lenders with specialized expertise in their industry and focus on cultivating a strong partnership, rather than solely optimizing for the lowest rate. Preparing quality financial statements in advance is also key, as lenders have become more sophisticated in their scrutiny. Startups should aim for audited financials, if feasible, to streamline the due diligence process and potentially facilitate deal-making.

In summary, navigating venture debt in the current funding climate requires startups to be strategic, discerning, and proactive. By carefully considering the trade-offs, building strong lender relationships, and ensuring financial readiness, startups can leverage venture debt to fuel their growth while mitigating risks.

Dealing with Distress: Lenders’ Approach to Troubled Startup Borrowers

When dealing with distressed startups that have raised venture debt, lenders must take a collaborative and pragmatic approach to achieve the best possible outcome. Despite any initial dissatisfaction, a successful workout requires all parties – lenders, management, and other stakeholders – to work together transparently and recognize the inherent value in the company’s assets.

Lenders should be proactive in identifying signs of financial distress, such as a startup’s failure to meet key milestones or its inability to raise fresh equity. When these issues arise, lenders should be upfront about their concerns and work collaboratively with the startup’s management to find a mutually agreeable financial solution that supports the company’s growth and path to cash flow positivity.

Employees and the management team are the primary stakeholders in a distressed startup scenario. Ensuring their motivation and satisfaction is crucial, as they are the ones who will ultimately drive the company’s turnaround efforts. Creditors must be willing to take a collaborative approach with management, even if it means accepting a less-than-ideal outcome for equity holders.

The concept of “management carve-outs” can be a useful tool in guiding distressed startups through this challenging period. In these situations, management teams may be unfamiliar with the complexities of insolvency and financial distress. Experienced general partners from the venture capital world can play a valuable role in helping management navigate these uncharted waters and align their actions with their fiduciary obligations to all stakeholders.

The emphasis is on having sponsors with strong track records and a proven ability to navigate these complex distress scenarios effectively. A single sponsor may be more efficient and have a distinct risk perspective, while a syndicate may face greater challenges in reaching consensus, potentially carrying slightly more risk.

While lenders must adopt a cooperative and pragmatic mindset, the key outcome is to maximize recovery. By prioritizing the needs of key stakeholders, leveraging management carve-outs, and maintaining transparent communication, lenders can increase the chances of a successful turnaround and maximize the value of the company’s assets

The Golden Age Of Credit: The Landscape Of Venture Debt And Bank Capital

Private credit as a broad asset class continues to attract significant fundraising dollars, with the venture debt category following suit and resulting in an ever-growing lending landscape. In recent years, there has been a notable compression in the cost of capital across various types of lending, including traditional bank facilities and venture debt. The increase in overall interest rates has led to a narrower pricing spread between these financing options, making bank capital more competitive in the current environment.

The emergence of larger, traditional investors exploring venture debt as an asset class has further validated its importance. For example, BlackRock’s acquisition of Kreos Capital, a European venture debt platform, highlights the growing prominence of this financing avenue. Kreos Capital has invested more than €5.2 billion through nearly 750 transactions across 19 countries since 1998. Another notable acquisition is Monroe Capital’s purchase of Horizon Technology Finance (NASDAQ: HRZN), a non-banking leading specialty finance company that provides venture debt financing. Monroe Capital, a $18.4 billion private credit firm with a 20-year track record in direct lending, has directly originated and invested more than $3 billion in venture loans to over 315 growing companies. These high-profile acquisitions by major players like BlackRock and Monroe Capital underscore the increasing significance of the venture debt market. The influx of larger, traditional investors validates venture debt as an attractive asset class, ushering in a “golden age” of credit with favorable conditions for investors.

In the aftermath of SVB’s collapse, major global banks have been jockeying to position themselves as the new preferred lender for startups globally. Institutions like JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, and Deutsche Bank have all made concerted efforts to capture this lucrative market. JPMorgan, for example, has been actively expanding its venture banking division, seeking to leverage its deep pockets and extensive resources to attract startups. The bank has touted its ability to provide comprehensive financial services, from lending to treasury management, to cater to the unique needs of high-growth companies. This trend has been driven by the increased capital formation within the venture capital community, allowing companies to stay private and grow for longer. As this trend reversed, leading to greater need of venture debt, traditional lenders have improved their underwriting capabilities to facilitate larger transactions.

Mature venture debt markets, such as the US and Europe, have demonstrated that both private venture debt funds and venture debt banks can coexist harmoniously. This provides startups with access to different lender profiles, allowing them to choose the most suitable option – a private lender with more flexibility in their lending criteria or established venture banks that provide tailored banking solutions. The coexistence of private venture debt funds and venture debt banks has proven to be beneficial for startups, as it provides them with a diverse range of financing options to support their growth and expansion plans.

In the burgeoning venture debt markets of North Asia, excluding China and India, Japanese banks have been actively establishing a foothold to lend to Japanese startups. Major players such as MUFG, Mizuho Bank, Aozora Bank, and Tokyo Star Bank have been aggressively pursuing opportunities in this space, recognizing the growth potential of the local thriving startup ecosystem. Over in South and Southeast Asia, HSBC recently announced the launch of a $1 billion ASEAN growth fund and a $150 million venture debt fund dedicated to the Singapore market. This followed two other $100 million HSBC single market venture debt vehicles – a MYR$500 (~US$104) million fund for Malaysia, and AUD$227 (~US$147) million fund for Australia.

Venture Debt In Southeast Asia: Fueling Growth, Mitigating Risk, Embracing Sophistication

The venture debt landscape in Southeast Asia is undergoing a transformative phase, driven by several key factors regionally and globally. Firstly, the region is witnessing a surging demand for alternative financing options, fueled by the burgeoning startup ecosystem and the need for capital to fuel growth. This growing demand has attracted competition from traditional banks and specialized venture debt providers, giving rise to co-lending opportunities, enabling lenders to collaborate and share risk.

These factors are collectively shaping the trajectory of venture debt as an alternative financing option in Southeast Asia’s burgeoning startup ecosystem. Private lenders, such as Genesis Alternative Ventures, are well-positioned to capitalize on this evolving landscape. As startups adapt to challenging market conditions and prioritize profitability, private lenders can continue to grow alongside the ecosystem, deploying debt financing to support lean, efficient, and profitable ventures.

The venture debt landscape in Southeast Asia is dynamic and rapidly evolving, presenting both opportunities and challenges for lenders and borrowers alike. Those who can navigate this landscape adeptly, balancing risk and opportunity while embracing sophistication and collaboration, will be poised to thrive in this exciting and promising market.

 

References:

  1. Early-stage startups seeking venture debt find investor prestige isn’t enough
  2.  Q4 2023 Public BDC Venture Lender Earnings
  3.  Spring thaws venture debt market, but not everyone is feeling the warmth
  4.  One year after SVB, the throne sits empty
  5.  Life after debt: Venture debt funding could grow again in 2024
  6. B Capital’s M&A adviser expects startup-to-startup M&A to heat up

GS_Peck-copy-1280x669.jpg

Founder’s Playbook: Breaking Taboos One Period At A Time

The startup journey is often a David-versus-Goliath story, where a small upstart entrepreneur takes on bigger and more established players. This journey is inherently challenging, but when you address a pain point shrouded in taboo, you compound those challenges exponentially. 

Today, in our Founder’s PlayBook, we had the privilege to speak with Tan Peck Ying, the co-founder of Blood (formerly known as PSLove). Blood raised a SGD2m Series A round in May 2023 from AngelCentral and DSG Consumer Partners. 

Not one to shy away from sensitive issues, Peck Ying has been trailblazing a path, addressing menstrual health for the past nine years. Her journey began with her own experience of severe menstrual cramps that had plagued her since high school. During her tenure at NUS Enterprise, the prospect of transforming a small startup into a game-changing entity excited her, prompting her to leave her corporate job in 2014 to pursue this mission.

———

Peck Ying’s journey in her own words

Blood co-Founders: Caleb Leow and Peck Ying Tan. Source: Blood

 

My co-founder, Caleb Leow,  is also my spouse and we share a common vision, passion, and ambition for our business. I admit that starting a business with your partner is not easy, but it can work if you have a solid relationship, respect each other’s opinions, and divide your roles clearly. For instance, I have the final say in Product and Growth and I defer to him on all things technical R&D and branding. We have learned how to collaborate and support each other’s decisions in our respective domains. 

Reflecting on my journey as a female founder addressing women’s health that is generally considered taboo, I’ve identified some key learnings along this journey:

Define Your Niche in a Crowded Market: We are not intimidated by the fierce competition in the sanitary pads market as we have a proven solution. What drives us is creating a challenger brand that stands out from the crowd and shows consumers that we care about their needs and well-being.

Be planet-friendly where possible: In the case of our new sanitary pads line, our commitment to environmental responsibility was aligned with our customers’ values. After extensive experimentation with materials like bamboo and cotton, we concluded that corn was the ideal choice for the top sheet. Not only does corn offer superior absorption performance, but it is also 100% biodegradable.

Obsess about Performance: At Blood, we scrutinize every aspect of our value offering, from the materials used to the size, contouring, and even the adhesive type. Beyond product, our passion for innovation extends into our customer journey and our business ethos. We pay close attention to user feedback and respond to every DM (direct message) on social media.

Embrace Diversity: Fun fact: as much as we are in the female healthcare space, our company gender ratio is about equally male and female. We believe in gender neutrality – the guys in our team bring a different perspective. They tell us what our business partners, VCs, etc., are thinking and provide a neutral and objective viewpoint. When guys come for job interviews, they ask, “Is it okay if I do not know anything about periods?” and for me, that is okay because they provide an objective viewpoint that balances ours. After all, business is gender-neutral.

Dare to be Bold: In 2018, we rebranded PSLove to Blood. Yes, it is a polarising name but there was a method to our madness. The reason behind this transformation was to convey a stronger message and challenge the menstrual health taboo head-on. And PSLove just didn’t get the job done as it sounds like something close to your heart, something warm and fuzzy. So, we faced the risk of being forgotten. 

Source: Blood

 

We wanted a name that could really cut through the noise and bring our mission forward. Blood powerfully embodies what we’re trying to do — normalize periods. There’s nothing shameful about bleeding; most women bleed once a month, and it’s a normal part of our lives. So we are now proudly Blood.

Like many businesses, Blood faced daunting challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic as retail was a large segment of their business. While their product was considered essential, they still had to find creative ways for cross-border shipping. Fortunately, they held a healthy inventory locally and were not reliant on their China factory. 

Recognizing TikTok’s potential to reach their target audience, teenagers, they harnessed the platform to showcase their products, engage with a younger demographic, and promote menstrual health and wellbeing education.

“Our Go-to-Market approach has shifted from e-commerce to social commerce and TikTok,” Peck Ying notes. “We wanted to go where our consumers are going. And TikTok is the perfect platform for our messaging.”

Looking ahead, Blood has ambitious plans to expand its presence in Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia, with a mission to become a mass-market challenger brand that resonates with consumers. Blood is not just a business; it’s a movement that empowers women and normalizes conversations around a once-taboo subject.

 


AdobeStock_260429911-1280x853.jpeg

Choosing the Right Venture Lender for Your Startup

 

Venture debt is a financing tool that can help startups achieve business milestones while being minimally dilutive to founders and early-stage investors. It can be used to extend the runway between equity raises, thus buying time for early-stage startups to hit key benchmarks. When used thoughtfully, venture debt can act as a catalyst for accelerated growth.

Just as you would meticulously evaluate a potential business partner or new hire, conducting due diligence on your venture lender is just as essential to ensure a mutually beneficial outcome. The criteria for choosing a venture lender closely mirror those for choosing a venture equity partner – but with a few important distinctions, which arise from the differences between debt and equity financing.

In this comprehensive guide, we unveil the critical steps for performing due diligence on your venture debt lender, helping you forge a partnership that straps rockets to your growth.

Assessing Added Value

Venture debt is more than just a loan. Scrutinize the value beyond the dollars – delve into the lender’s value add – operational acumen, industry connections, and advisory capabilities. Just as a venture equity partner brings expertise and a strategic network, a venture lender should ideally be able to advise on the technicality of your financial statements – are you over-spending on marketing, or why are you budgeting large overheads for staff expansion. You would also want a venture lender to bring their network and experience to significantly amplify your growth trajectory. Engage in candid conversations about their involvement in portfolio companies and how they’ve contributed to success.

For instance, at Genesis, our portfolio companies are integral to our community. We actively champion them to a diverse array of investors, partners, and clients, both within the virtual realm and offline arenas. (#GenesisStories)

Through Thick and Thin

The road to building a successful startup will be long and filled with potholes. Whether the loan spans one or three years, mutual trust will be very important. Throughout your interactions, ask yourself, “Am I dealing with someone who understands how a start-up grows? Will they stand shoulder-to-shoulder with us through the good times and bad?”

So speak to at least three of their Founders; ask about their lender’s behaviour during the COVID pandemic or recent tech funding winter. A venture debt partner who stands by your side through adversity is a valuable ally in ensuring your startup’s resilience and growth.

Mastering Key Terms

Unlike a venture equity firm’s term sheet, the one from your venture lender might throw some unfamiliar terms your way that are worth understanding in advance:

  1. Interest rate: This is the loan interest rate and be sure to know if it’s “fixed” or “floating”, “flat” or “annualized”. This makes a big difference in your repayments and cash flow.
  2. Duration of loan: This is typically one to three years depending on the working capital requirement and the venture lender’s fund life. Generally, longer-term loans are attractive as they allow more time for the capital to work and generate a return.
  3. Interest-only period: Given the cash-burn profile of startups, you can negotiate with your lender to defer paying the principal while servicing only the interest payments for an initial period of 3-6 months. In return, the lender may ask for additional upside, for example, more warrants or higher interest rates etc.
  4. Warrants: Warrants give the lender the right to purchase equity shares at a predetermined price at a future date. This usually amounts up to 20% of the loan principal amount. 
  5. Fees: There are several fees that Founder’s should be aware of e.g. origination fee, legal fee which are typically mandatory and then there are other fees such as “Unused fees”, or “Closing fees”, that are in addition to interest payments.
  6. Prepayment Penalties: In the happy event where your cashflow is more positive than forecasted, you may wish to pay off your debt early. Examine the penalties for early payment and there are may be creative ways to structure these penalties to mutual advantage e.g. a sliding scale expressed as a percentage of the loan as the loan period draws to a close.
  7. Covenants: are “stress tests” that companies must meet e.g. minimum working capital, EBITDA, or revenue etc. Have a candid discussion with your lender regarding the rationale behind each covenant. Usually covenants are not meant to be putative in nature but to ensure that the startup practices financial discipline.

Due Diligence on Due Diligence

Finally, take a moment to find out how the lender conducts its own diligence. Inquire about their due diligence process, including the depth of research, the rigor of analysis, and the criteria they prioritise. A thorough, systematic approach to due diligence indicates a commitment to informed decision-making, which will serve as a strong foundation for your partnership.

TLDR? Here’s our playbook on doing due diligence on your venture lender.


Aozora-Bank-invests-in-Genesis-Alternative-Ventures-fund-signs-MOU....webp

Aozora Bank invests in Genesis Alternative Ventures fund, signs MOU to
support Japanese start-ups’ expansion into Southeast Asia

Singapore, 4 June 2021 – Genesis Alternative Ventures said today that Aozora Bank has invested in its US$80 million venture debt fund and the two parties have also agreed to support the expansion of Japanese start-ups into Southeast Asia. Genesis and Aozora’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Aozora Corporate Investment, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) today for a business partnership that will, among others, provide “a more comprehensive support framework to Japanese venture-backed companies looking to expand into Southeast Asia.” The MOU will also see the two parties share information and expertise on venture debt and venture capital in Asia, execute joint marketing strategies targeting customers, introduce investment and financing opportunities for venture capital-backed companies in the region, and co-host events related to the venture capital
industry.

For Aozora, the partnership with Genesis follows a recent arrangement with SVB Capital, the investment arm of the US high-tech commercial bank Silicon Valley Bank. Dr Jeremy Loh, Co-Founder and Partner of Genesis Alternative Ventures, said: “We look forward to partnering Aozora to introduce venture debt to start-ups in Southeast Asia and Japan. “We believe that venture debt is ideal for young companies with strong growth trajectory as it will allow them to expand without diluting founders’ equity.” Aozora Bank is a full-service Tokyo-based bank with assets of more than ¥5 trillion and backed by some of the largest investment firms in the world. It launched a Japan venture debt fund in November 2020 for Japanese technology companies

Venture debt, generally deployed by way of senior, secured non-convertible debenture accompanied by equity options, is appropriate for emerging, high-growth businesses that need to extend their cash runway to get to the next stage of growth. These companies may lack the track record to meet traditional criteria for bank loans or their founders may wish to minimize equity dilution

Genesis was founded by Ben J Benjamin, Dr Jeremy Loh and Mr Martin Tang in 2019

About Genesis Alternative Ventures Genesis Alternative Ventures is Southeast Asia’s leading private lender to venture and growth-stage companies funded by tier-one VCs. Genesis is founded by a team of venture lending pioneers who have backed some of Southeast Asia’s best-loved companies. Armed with a strong reputation among entrepreneurs and investors, Genesis is a trusted partner in empowering corporate growth while minimizing shareholders’ equity dilution. Genesis was founded by Ben J Benjamin, Dr Jeremy Loh and Martin Tang in 2019.

For media queries, please contact:
Catherine Ong Associates | Catherine Ong Romesh Navaratnarajah
Mobile: (65) 9697 0007 |  Mobile: (65) 9016 0920
cath@catherineong.com | Email: romesh@catherineong.co


Masters-of-Cashflow-Visual.jpeg

A great insightful discussion with Ben J Benjamin from Genesis Alternative Ventures on the state of the funding climate in SEA and the role of Venture Debt!

When talking about fundraising the first type of funds entrepreneurs usually talk about is equity financing, let’s call it the typical VC fundraising route. But depending on the stage your startup is in, debt financing might be a good fit.

With a maturing tech-ecosystem, growing companies, bigger needs for working capital, and more profitability (or at least road to profitability) the need for alternatives to equity financing grows as well. Debt financing is a great option to explore.

Listen to the full episode here.